While you are here have a peak at politicalowl.com

Australia's 10 Least Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Areas

As Measured by the 2006 Census

Please note that where there is a map to the right of that for an individual census collection area that it is only for the purpose of giving a guide to where the census collection area is located. It does not mean that the wider area shown in the second map has the same social and economic disadvantage as the individual census collection district.

Also see the ABS note below which explains that being a "least socially and economically disadvantaged area" is not the same thing as being a "most advantaged" area.

Rank - No 37457 Rockingham, SW metropolitan Perth

Census Collection District 5062137 Population 26

Rank - No 37456 Corio, Geelong

Census Collection District 2112704 Population 572

Rank - No 37455 Willoughby - Lower Northern Sydney

Census Collectiion District 1382501 Population 421

Rank - No 37454 Woolahra - Eastern Suburbs, Sydney

Census Collection District 1441108 Populatiion 273

Rank - No 37453 Kingston , South Canberra

Census Collection District 8014305 Population 55

Rank No 37452 Lane Cove - Lower Northern Sydney

Census Collection District 1381709 Population 461

Rank No 37451 Dudley Park , Perth , WA

Census Collection District 5061118 Population 16

Rank No 37450 Pullenvale, North West Outer Brisbane

Census Collection District 3232501 Population 997

Rank No 37449 Bellevue Hill, Sydney NSW

Census Collection District 1440708 Population 292

Rank No 37448 Northbridge, Middle Harbour , Sydney

Census Collection District 1382908 Populatiion 499

The Australian Bureau of Statistics recommends taking caution when using the Preliminary Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage and urges
users to be aware of the following points:

  The Preliminary Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage is an  index of an area, not of individual residents in an area. The  socio-economic conditions of individual residents in any one area will  vary and there may be relatively advantaged residents living in areas   labelled as disadvantaged, and vice versa.
  The Preliminary Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage is a  measure of relative disadvantage only and is compiled using census  variables that show disadvantage, such as unemployment and low income.  Therefore it is statistically incorrect and misleading to reverse the  rankings to determine relatively advantaged or "best" areas.  The index  which measures advantage is the Index of Relative Socio-Economic  Advantage/Disadvantage which is due for release on 26 March.

  The Preliminary Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage is based  on Census Collection Districts, not suburbs. Therefore it is not  statistically valid to identify one collection district as being  representative of a wider area. It is also misleading.  The Preliminary Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage takes into  account a range of factors in determining both the social and also  economic conditions of an area.  The index is not an index of "social  disadvantage".

  There are four Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas and they are designed to  be used in conjunction with each other. By itself, the preliminary  release of the Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage may not  paint a complete picture of an area.

The ABS recommends using the full release of Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas due for release on 26 March 2008.