Magazines Make the Perfect Gift! Save Up To 92%
Home About Contact Election Indicator Political Betting

 

NEWS AND VIEWS
Australia

Other Countries

Subject Archive

Elections

Opinion Polls

Political Parties

The Media

Lobbyists

People

Public Service

Johs in Politics

 

Saturday, November 03, 2007

The Owl's Election Indicator : Coalition 28% Labor 72%

GO TO OTHER DAILY EMAILS - indexed by date

Howard Team Goes in to Reverse

The Government attacks on Labor as the Me Too party apparently have come to an end as the Coalition campaign team desperately searches for something, for absolutely anything, to put them back in this election race. It always struck me as counter productive to try and tarnish the image of Labor as being a fresh new alternative to a tired and boring government by suggesting that all it offered were John Howard's policies. As I wrote yesterday, if you believe your own policies are good ones, it is hard to believe the voters will be frightened by another side which promises to introduce them. Changing the Coalition message, therefore, is eminently sensible.

The new line being trotted out is that Labor is just saying it will follow the Liberal policies if it is elected while actually intending to do completely different things. The evidence for this accusation is something which the shadow Minister for the Environment, Peter Garrett, said to a couple of media people in an airport lounge while waiting to catch a plane. The low rating 2UE talking head Steve Price had shown Mr Garrett the Melbourne Herald Sun with its “$50b COPYCat” headline and the politician responded: "Once we get in, we'll just change it all."

The take on the comment by Nine Network television personality Richard Wilkins, also present, was “that it was very much a sort of light-hearted, throw-away line” but Price is a handy fellow with an egg beater. He told his listeners he was surprised by the Garrett comment which was “an insight as to what we might be in for if the polls are right and it goes to the suspicion that politicians and political parties will say and do anything to get elected like John Howard with his no-never GST and Paul Keating's L-A-W law tax cuts.”

For Coalition tacticians and for journalists on what was a slow and boring news day because the political party leaders were in Perth attending the funeral of a soldier killed in Afghanistan , the words of Price were manna. The claim by Garrett that his conversation with Price had been jocular was brushed aside and the observation of Richard Wilkins was not allowed to get in the way of a good yarn.

With the PM away, Treasurer Peter Costello was paraded to solemnly declare that “Peter Garrett, I think, in a moment of candour and truth, has really exploded Kevin Rudd's pretence; these are the words that are going to haunt this campaign from now on: ‘once we get in, we'll just change it all'.”

The television stations last night loved it as did the newspapers this morning.

It was more than enough to give the Coalition the victory on The Daily Verdict for Friday.

Day 19 - Friday 2 November

 

Coalition

ALP

Television

1.43

0.48

Newspapers

0.14

0.00

Radio

0.32

0.32

Internet

0.21

0.09

TOTAL

2.10

0.90

This afternoon Prime Minister John Howard confirmed the change in Coalition campaign strategy from Labor's “Me Tooism” to Labor's plan for breaking promises. Mr Howard said he did not think Mr Garrett's remarks were a joke or a gaffe and they showed the Labor party would form a radical and risky government. “What he's done is confirm the suspicions so many of us have had for so long and that is the me-tooism is nothing more than a dodgy strategy to get elected,'” Mr Howard told reporters in Darwin. “You don't joke about what your intentions are in government three weeks out from the election. That's just, altogether, unbelievable. What Mr Garrett has done is belled the cat. He's told the truth.”

So what will it all amount to in the longer run? Very little I suspect.

It's Difference of Opinion that Makes an Opinion Poll Interesting

When you buy The Australian like I do every day you pay your money and can take your choice. There's always a variety of opinion and never more so than this morning when there were two very different interpretations of some Newspoll research in to voting intentions in marginal seats.

The paper's political editor, Dennis Shanahan, had the star billing with his optimistic assessment for the Government of what the survey of almost 3500 voters in the most marginal seats in NSW, Victoria , Queensland and South Australia actually meant. In a piece labeled as ANALYSIS, Sol Lebovic, the founder and former chairman of Newspoll acting during this campaign as The Weekend Australian's polling consultant, found little for John Howard and his team to be optimistic about at all.

The views are so startlingly different that a casual reader might mistakenly think they were commenting on completely different polls.

The poll according to Sol Lebovic , former Newspoll boss

The poll according to Dennis Shanahan , Political editor

Little for Coalition to cling to

PM fights back in key seats

… the latest Newspoll is not good news for the Government although there is a glimmer of hope in NSW.

JOHN Howard has fought back in key marginal seats in NSW and Victoria, giving the Coalition at least some new hope of winning the election …

Even allowing for sampling error, and taking the best-case scenario for the Coalition, the Government would struggle to retain office on these numbers.

But the survey suggests the extent of the Coalition's losses will be between eight seats -- which would allow it to easily retain government -- and 22 seats, a six-seat win to Labor.

This latest Newspoll in the most marginal seats in NSW, Victoria, Queensland and South Australia shows the swing in these seats, 7 per cent since the last election, is virtually identical to the 6.8 per cent national swing measured in last weekend's Newspoll.

While the ALP is still in front of the Coalition in key marginal electorates, the gap is much narrower than national polling indicates -- a margin of just three points on primary votes, 47 per cent to 44 per cent.

The best case for the Coalition, 48.7 per cent, still represents a swing to Labor of 5.3 per cent, almost enough for it to win office without the other states.

On a best-case scenario for the Coalition, it would lose only eight seats and hold government with a majority of eight seats.

If this 7per cent swing in these four states was uniformly replicated on election day, Labor would pick up 25 seats and easily win office. Even if the Coalition did extremely well in the other states and territories not covered by this poll there are just not enough seats available to counter this massive gain.

On a worst-case basis for the Coalition, using the Newspoll survey of the 18 most marginal Coalition seats in Queensland, NSW, Victoria and South Australia, the Howard Government would lose 22 seats, giving Mr Rudd a slim victory of six seats.

 

 

 

 

Whales & Friends Catalog 

© Richard Farmer 2007